Guitar Stories: Eddie Van Halen’s Ibanez Destroyer

September 06, 2019 3 min read

Guitar Stories: Eddie Van Halen’s Ibanez Destroyer

When you think of Eddie Van Halen, you think of the Frankenstein.

His heavily modified Stratocaster is an icon. Probably one of the most important guitars in the history of rock and roll, it’s synonymous with Eddie, and his fabled early “brown sound.”

But, what if I told you that Eddie didn’t use the Frankenstein for half the songs on the band’s landmark self-titled debut?

Super-Strats became Eddie’s guitars of choice by the 1980s. But, in the early days of Van Halen, the Ibanez Destroyer was the king of his rig. And, it’s the guitar that he played for some of VH’s defining early moments. 

So what’s the story of the Destroyer? When did he use it? And how come it isn’t a mainstay of his rig today?

Let’s dive in and find out.

Early days

DestroyerAs I noted in my previous Gibson Explorer article (LINK), the Ibanez Destroyer was a revelation when it dropped in 1975. For heavy guitarists craving the sound and aesthetics of Gibson’s long out-of-production axe, the Destroyer was a viable, and affordable alternative that didn’t sacrifice the tonal qualities of the original.

It’s believed Eddie bought his Destroyer in ’75 or ’76. And, for a while, he played it as was. But, by January ’77, as photos from a gig at the Starwood Nightclub in Hollywood show, he’d made some minor mods.

The Destroyer shipped in a clear, light amber finish, intended to make its Sen (Japanese ash) body look like the Korina wood of the original Explorer. But, never one to shy away from visual flare, Ed had the entire body, back and headstock painted white. He also replaced the Gibson-imitating “top hat” knobs with Strat knobs and, for some further added pizazz, switched the chrome bridge for a gold-plated one. 

Recording ‘Van Halen’

So, exactly how much use did the Destroyer get on ‘Van Halen’ numero uno? Quite a lot, as the man himself revealed in a Guitar Player interview:

“I played it on every song that doesn’t have any vibrato-bar parts on it, like ‘You Really Got Me.’ I can’t remember what pickups were in it when I recorded the album—I was always changing them*—but that was before I cut that big chunk out of it.”

*Note: photos of the instrument from ’77 – ’78 show the stock, chrome-covered Maxon Super 70 humbuckers intact, suggesting that Eddie didn’t switch them out before recording VH1.

To break it down further, that fat, in-your-face Destroyer tone is also heard on ‘Runnin’ with the Devil,’ ‘Jamie’s Cryin,’ ‘Feel Your Love Tonight’ and ‘On Fire.’ And, Eddie used the instrument to create some startling sound effects that he couldn’t achieve on the Frankenstein. As Guitar World (via Van Halen News Desk) noted in a 2011 Feature, those included:

“…the high-pitched metallic scrape on the ‘Runnin’ with the Devil’ intro (performed by swiping the strings between the bridge and stop tailpiece) and the stuttering effect on the solo to ‘You Really Got Me’ (produced by setting the neck pickup volume to “0” and flicking the pickup selector switch).” 

 

 

“The Shark” surfaces…

The Destroyer was integral to the early Van Halen sound. So, why didn’t it stay in Eddie’s rig in the years that followed? Unfortunately, this was one instance where the guitarist’s famed tinkering tendencies got the better of him.

 

 

Van HalenShortly after the recording of the first album, Eddie made some heavy mods to the Destroyer. All were cosmetic, and most were pretty standard fare: he painted it in red and white stripes – the classic VH color scheme, added some Les Paul -style volume knobs, filled in a hole for the missing middle knob and removed the pickguard.

Then, in a more drastic move, Eddie took a chainsaw to the instrument and cut a large v-shaped hole out of the body below the bridge. Rechristened “the Shark.” he loved the dramatic look. What didn’t hold up so well, however, was the tone.

…and loses its bite

As he found when out on the road, losing a huge chunk of mahogany from the body didn’t do wonders for “the Shark’s” sound. The fat, ballsy Explorer tone that defined the first VH record was lost. The mod made it look like a deep-sea predator. But, in the sonic department, it clearly lost its bite. 

And so, the Destroyer was ultimately retired, though, not without a final send-off from Eddie. While he doesn’t actually play it on the album, it’s the instrument he’s posing with on the cover to 1980’s “Women and Children First.” It was testament to EVH’s continued affection for the guitar, and the impact it had on his mighty sound.

Do you play an Ibanez Destroyer? What’s your favorite Eddie moment on the first Van Halen album? Share your stories in the comments.



Also in Fingerboard Stories

Time Corrected Van Halen is the Worst Van Halen
Time Corrected Van Halen is the Worst Van Halen

April 09, 2021 2 min read

“They’d barely had any studio experience… at that point, we really wanted to get them before they knew what they were doing – just have them come in and play and then get them out. So we spent very little time in pre-production, in fact, we treated the first album like it was a demo.”
Picks Are Way Older than You Think…
Picks Are Way Older than You Think…

March 25, 2021 3 min read

As a quick recap, in the late 19th century, picks made from tortoiseshell (the shell of hawksbill sea turtles to be precise) were the gold standard when it came to assisted strumming. However, this along with the popularity of tortoiseshell in the manufacture of a bunch of other stuff, lead to the near extinction of the hawksbill sea turtle. Once it was placed on the endangered species list in 1973, tortoiseshell picks went the way of the dodo.
Where Do You Stand on Modeling Amps?
Where Do You Stand on Modeling Amps?

March 19, 2021 3 min read

Fortus isn’t wrong about the challenges of achieving certain tonal subtleties when using modelling amps and plugins. But, the truth is, the technology is getting better. I’ve been playing around with a couple of tube amp imitating plugins recently that get surprisingly close to capturing the nuances Fortus is talking about – at least to my luddite ears. And, I don’t doubt that differences between modelling amps and the real thing will be practically imperceptible in the not too distant future.